This week someone wrote to Carolyn Hax, Washington Post advice columnist, that when she and her siblings had to quickly move their parents into assisted living, Letter Writer and her parents decided that it made most sense for the parents’ furniture to be saved for her sister’s children to use when they moved away from home. Sister seemed to go along with this during the hurried move. Several years later (yes, several), Letter Writer wanted to look at the stuff in storage. Oops. Sister confessed that had taken a carload of stuff home and had the rest hauled to the dump. Letter Writer felt betrayed. Letter Writer did not seem upset that she didn’t get the stuff but that Sister deprived her own children of useful furniture.
Carolyn and the commenters were largely unsympathetic. They argued:
Storage is expensive. I’ve told clients this for years. You end up re-buying your stuff over and over again – stuff that you don’t use now and may never use again. If you pay $150 per month for storage, that’s $1800 per year – and $9,000 for 5 years. Furniture doesn’t hold up very well in storage unless the facility is climate controlled – which is even more expensive.
The grandkids won’t want their grandparents’ furniture and other junk when they are twenty-something and move into their first, probably tiny apartment. Older furniture is usually bulky and not currently in style. After a few years in storage, it will likely be dirty (if it wasn’t when put in storage) and old.
Charity stores wouldn’t want the furniture and junk either. I don’t think this is true. A few charities in Austin will come pick up furniture. But someone has to arrange for pick up and hang around on the date the charity can come, which could be weeks away. But, Carolyn and commentators commented, if Letter Writer wanted to pursue this option, then she should have taken responsibility for contacting charities and making arrangements.
I have to point out that the commentators are clearly all financially comfortable and probably always have been. My current dining table was in my brother’s garage for several years. I used to be an artist and wanted a table I could scratch and bang up – and was free! I have several other pieces of furniture I obtained in used condition. I’ve inherited several printers from my mother over the years – she is apparently an early adapter who frequently upgrades; I am an adapter-only-when-forced. And there is no such thing as an unwanted bookcase in my family. So someone might want your used furniture. But maybe no one in the family will. I am not under the illusion anyone in my family will want any of my very used stuff – except maybe the bookcases.
So what are my take-aways from the responses to the letter?